Treatment of Working Capital in Investment Analysis - Part II

Teemu Aho and Ilkka Virtanen

English summary

The objective of these two papers (Treatment of working capital in investment analysis - Part I; The Finnish Journal of Business Economics 3-1982, 255-278 and the present paper) was firstly to show that the alternative ways of considering the working capital investment - cost basis and payment basis - in the methods of investment appraisal lead to the same profitability effect of investment. Secondly, the purpose of these two papers was to go throught the methods to be followed in including working capital in various methods of investment appraisal.

In the first paper it was shown that inflation worsens the profitability of an investment when the present value method is used. This was due to a continuously increasing need for nominal working capital. The present value sensitivity of a working capital investment was very strong in reaction to inflation, the percentage change of the present value being -((1 + i)/i) 100 s, where i refers to the real discount rate and s to the rate of inflation. The change in the present value is linearly dependent on the rate of inflation.

Using the annuity methods as the method of investment appraisal, inflation raises the annual capital costs (annuity) by the amount of -s(1 + i) W, where W refers to the real amount of the working capital. The rise of the capital costs is thus the product of the rate of inflation and the working capital investment in year 0 multiplied by the real discount factor. It was also shown that a profitable investment under non-inflation becomes nonprofitable due to inflation if the rate of inflation is higher than a certain critical rate of inflation (sī).

Using the IRR as the method of investment appraisal the working capital was considered only on payment basis. Inflation decreased the real IRR. Thus as inflation increases the real profitability of the investment worsens.

Using the payback method the working capital was considered only on payment basis, because the payback period measures the financial effects of the investment. As the non-interest payback period is shorter than the service life of the investment, the payback period under inflation can be solved either by using the equation n* = (C + W)/(P - sW) (in real terms) or S(n*,s) = (C + W)/((1 + s)P - sW) (in money terms), where n* refers to the payback period (non-interest), C to the amount of investment in fixed assets, P to uniform annual net returns, s to the rate of inflation, W to the real working capital and S(n*,s) to the prolongation factor for uniform annual payments. The product of sW can also be interpreted as the real value of nominal annual increase in working capital. If the investment is totally financed by debt, the payback period can be solved by the first mentioned equation. It presupposes that amortizations and interest on debt are not affected by inflation. In that case inflation shorters the pay back period. If the latter equation is applied, inflation lenghtens the pay back period. Correspondingly the interest bearing payback period n*(i) can be solved by the equation a(n*(i),i) = (C + W)/(P - (1 + i)sW). In this case inflation lenghtens the interest bearing pay back period.

(The Finnish Journal of Business Economics 4-1982, 398-428)